Low Code vs. Ruby on Rails: Comparing Approaches for Building an MVP

When creating a Minimum Viable Product (MVP), choosing between a low-code platform and a custom solution built on something like Ruby on Rails can be challenging. Each approach has advantages and disadvantages that can significantly impact the project depending on the product’s needs and future potential. Below, we explore the key points of each approach based on a comparative analysis.

Low-code

Advantages:

Disadvantages:

Ruby on Rails

Advantages:

Disadvantages:

Embracing Change: A Reality of MVP Development

One of the most common challenges in MVP development is dealing with unexpected changes. It’s not uncommon for users to realize, after trying a quick prototype, that they forgot to request some essential features. As expected, adjustments and iterations become part of the process. Moreover, creative new ideas often emerge as users interact with the product, leading to unique requirements that weren’t initially considered.

Planning a project with certainty about the future is ideal, but for MVPs, such certainty is rare. When requirements evolve, the ability to adapt becomes critical. This is why having a development approach that provides future flexibility is so valuable. While low-code platforms excel at delivering quick results for well-defined scopes, custom frameworks like Ruby on Rails leave more options open for handling the unexpected.

Comparative Study by Project Phases

1. Initial prototype

2. Adding features

3. Unique or innovative functionality

4. Scalability

Which Should You Choose?

Choose low-code if:

Choose Ruby on Rails if: